NETGEAR SXK80-100EUS

Product Information

For a typical ten-person or less office, the SXK30 has enough bandwidth to easily handle most needs, especially if you tie the satellites using wired networking and the building infrastructure isn’t especially challenging for WiFi signals. Therefore, at close range, connections of over 500mbits per second are entirely plausible. But that’s a single connection at close range, and a second connection at that speed would consume all the bandwidth that 5GHz has to offer (1200Mbit). wlan: [9422:I:ANY] ol_ath_vap_set_param: 2139: VDEV params:HE su_bfee:1|su_bfer:1|mu_bfee:0|mu_bfer:1|dl_muofdma:1|ul_muofdma:1|ul_mumimo:1 Where this option differs from the SXK80 hardware is that the Ethernet switch components had link aggregation and 2.5 GbE Ethernet on that design, but those features are both missing from the SXK30.

The two share the same Insight mobile app with the "cloud-managed" approach in management via the Insight mobile app. In a nutshell, you need to link the system to a Netgear account and then manage your network via a remote server. wlan: [9586:I:ANY] ol_ath_vap_set_param: 2139: VDEV params:HE su_bfee:1|su_bfer:1|mu_bfee:0|mu_bfer:1|dl_muofdma:1|ul_muofdma:1|ul_mumimo:0 wlan: [7818:I:ANY] ieee80211_cfg80211_radio_attach: 11017: ic: 0xffffffc033000880, wdev: 0xffffffc033010a70, wiphy: 0xffffffc03559f2a0, netdev: 0xffffffc033000000 Where single point connection speed is paramount, then the SXK30 probably isn’t the best choice, but then it could easily be argued that wireless networking overall isn’t ideal for this job.of_get_named_gpiod_flags: parsed 'phy-reset-gpio' property of node '/soc/mdio@90000[1]' - status (0)

By the way, you can use the SXK30's hardware unit with that of the SXK80 -- though not ideal. However, you can not mix Pro and non-Pro hardware at all. wlan: [7818:I:ANY] wlan_pdev_operation: 744: num_radios=2, wifi_radios[1].sc = ffffffc033060880_radio_type = 2Originally I tried using the last release artifact from your repo, but when I tried that I had wired ethernet but no Wireless: [ 6.437609] ath11k c000000.wifi: failed to fetch board data for bus=ahb,qmi-chip-id=0,qmi-board-id=255,variant=Netgear-SXS80 from ath11k/IPQ8074/hw2.0/board-2.bin sps_register_bam_device : unable to create IPC Logging 1 for bam 0x0000000008b04000sps_register_bam_device : unable to create IPC Logging 2 for bam 0x0000000008b04000 wlan: [9117:I:ANY] ol_ath_vap_set_param: 2139: VDEV params:HE su_bfee:1|su_bfer:1|mu_bfee:0|mu_bfer:1|dl_muofdma:1|ul_muofdma:0|ul_mumimo:1

From the outside, the two parts look practically identical. The only significant difference between the router and satellite is that the four Ethernet ports on the router include a single WAN port to connect to the Internet broadband modem. On the satellite, all four are for distributing a wired network. bridge: automatic filtering via arp/ip/ip6tables has been deprecated. Update your scripts to load br_netfilter if you need this. Memory: 890268K/920448K available (6811K kernel code, 752K rwdata, 2816K rodata, 248K init, 440K bss, 30180K reserved, 0K cma-reserved) Anyone have any experience to tell me this should or should not be happening? I'd much prefer to use the Pro system - both because its several hundred less than I paid for the consumer system and because I have a Firewalla purple on the way that I wanted the option for VLAN setup. But there is no way that's worth it if the performance isn't on par with what we are getting from the consumer model - which is giving us - for the first time in this house - wifi that allows us to use the network the way we want.The Orbi Pro Wi-Fi 6 mesh system shares the same Wi-Fi specs as the home version. For the most part, it’s the same hardware that runs a different firmware and is managed via a separate mobile app called Insight. FullName wlan: [7818:I:ANY] wlan_pdev_operation: 744: num_radios=3, wifi_radios[2].sc = ffffffc0330a0880_radio_type = 2